It was suggested to me, in the kindest possible of ways, that
perhaps I’m over-reacting.
I’ve asked myself the same thing. I vacillate between two reactions: the first being that this is the most devastating thing I’ve ever lived through; the second that this is, in the grand scheme of things, not that much to bear. I think of what the rest of the world suffers, has suffered, will suffer, and I feel ashamed for my own sorrow, my own self-pity.
***
Before we knew about the missed miscarriage, I asked Gilles if he loved … it. We didn’t call it a baby. It wasn’t a baby, it wasn’t a person – not to us, not yet. It was the beginning of that, of course; it could have been; it would have been, if fate hadn’t followed the path it had to take – but to us, it wasn’t that yet.
He hesitated a moment, not wanting to hurt me with his honesty. “No,” he said. “I love the idea of it. I love what the future holds for us. But I can’t love … it. Not yet. But you know that I will.”
He didn’t hurt me. That was exactly how I felt too.
But losing what the future had held for us, without knowing what it would have been; preparing to love that much and that deeply before learning that nothing would exist to be to be loved … I couldn’t have imagined the pain.
***
I watched this "Momversation" recently. I searched for it; I had wondered if miscarriage had been covered.
“It’s losing a child,” it begins. Pause for emphasis. “It’s losing a child.”
That’s a gripping introduction, certainly, but I don’t agree with it. I don’t mean to minimize the pain of miscarriage – how could I, after what I’ve been living through – but I don’t think it can be equivalent to that of losing a child who has existed beyond mere potential.
I’ve asked myself the same thing. I vacillate between two reactions: the first being that this is the most devastating thing I’ve ever lived through; the second that this is, in the grand scheme of things, not that much to bear. I think of what the rest of the world suffers, has suffered, will suffer, and I feel ashamed for my own sorrow, my own self-pity.
***
Before we knew about the missed miscarriage, I asked Gilles if he loved … it. We didn’t call it a baby. It wasn’t a baby, it wasn’t a person – not to us, not yet. It was the beginning of that, of course; it could have been; it would have been, if fate hadn’t followed the path it had to take – but to us, it wasn’t that yet.
He hesitated a moment, not wanting to hurt me with his honesty. “No,” he said. “I love the idea of it. I love what the future holds for us. But I can’t love … it. Not yet. But you know that I will.”
He didn’t hurt me. That was exactly how I felt too.
But losing what the future had held for us, without knowing what it would have been; preparing to love that much and that deeply before learning that nothing would exist to be to be loved … I couldn’t have imagined the pain.
***
I watched this "Momversation" recently. I searched for it; I had wondered if miscarriage had been covered.
“It’s losing a child,” it begins. Pause for emphasis. “It’s losing a child.”
That’s a gripping introduction, certainly, but I don’t agree with it. I don’t mean to minimize the pain of miscarriage – how could I, after what I’ve been living through – but I don’t think it can be equivalent to that of losing a child who has existed beyond mere potential.
So what is it, then?
It’s the loss of a dream, an unending, endless dream of life validated and continued and passed on in a tiny grain of life newly begun.
It’s the loss of a hope, a bottomless wish, a deepest longing that goes beyond simple human desire to the most profound human need.
It’s the loss of a life imagined, as well as of lives imagined: ours as parents. A string of little moments we could have lived that together would have made the lives we want to lead. This, for example. Choosing a family walk as a quotidian tradition to faithfully uphold. Gilles and I can always walk together; together but alone, alone but together. But we’d like – we want – no, that’s not enough; we need, we need – someone else – someone elses – to be by our side.
Perhaps it can be made even simpler: saudade.
Saudade!
***
There would have been somebody and now there won’t.
***
Am I over-reacting? In the face of this, I can't feel any other way.
You are most certainly not overreacting. I think that many people who have never experienced this kind of loss do not understand the profound effect it has on us. Jeremiah 1:5 says that "Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you, before you were born I set you apart." After reading that, I realized that this is a real loss. It is a big deal and its okay to treat it as such.
ReplyDeleteThank you for that. And I think it is true that others who have not experienced this do not, cannot, understand it. In fact, I don't think I myself would have, before it happened to me (I might write about this soon).
DeleteOf course you have the right to be upset! It must be a terrible thing to go through.
ReplyDeleteI never experienced a loss like this, but from reading other's blogs in the ALI world, this is exactly how I think I would have reacted to an early loss. Not grieving the loss of a person as much as a dream and an idea...
ReplyDeleteExactly ... although if we had had a chance to see a living being through ultrasound before learning of the loss, perhaps it would have felt more like losing a person, as well as all the dreams and ideas that would still be associated. I can't say. All I can say is that I never could have imagined the devastation before it happened.
Delete